Archive for the ‘Sea Trout’ Category

Winter arrives at Finavon

Thursday, January 17th, 2013

These bulletin blogs represent news about Finavon and the South Esk, and my views as a riparian owner. They are not the views of any other organisation, nor are they designed to promote the interests of any individual or organisation other than Finavon Castle Water and factors affecting the fishery. Tony Andrews

The early part of the winter – up to about five days ago – was mild and wet. These were probably good conditions for kelts to exit the river although very few of these fish survive to enter the river and spawn again. Not much research has been undertaken into kelt survival in Scotland compared with rivers in Canada where there are so many kelt that a strange sport called ‘black fishing’ takes place in April and May each year, when large numbers of local anglers fish for kelt- on a 100% catch & release basis. I was told on a visit to the Mirimachi in New Brunswick  in 2011 that kelt survival in that river is as high as 30%. In Scotland we think survival rates are about 5%. I expect most of the South Esk’s kelts to be moving downstream, and spawning should now be over.

Will Wells repairing the RB bridge following flood damage

Will Wells of Scottish Oak on the bridge at Red Brae during repairs following flood damage in December

Our two labradors, Tally and Tinca, are finding salmon remains dispersed far and wide in trees and in fields along the river banks. As the weather warms up these corpses will smell worse and the dogs will be banished to their kennels after a good swim until the pong has subsided. It’s all part of our riverside experience as the winter draws into its last phase!

Tally and Tinca after feasting on rotten kelt corpses

Tally & Tinca after their disgusting feast of rotten kelt corpses

Speaking with Colin Gibb at Inshewan last week we discussed the likelihood of the odd fish having entered the middle river following the warm and high water of the winter up to last week. We agreed that some fish have probably got upstream of Brechin, but not in great numbers. My guess is that any fish that are in the river will be downstream of Justinhaugh Bailey bridge, and well worth a cast in the first days of the new season after the 16th of April.

Red Brae Hut in January snow 2013

Red Brae Hut was built in 1993 and has witnessed many a celebration of fine catches of salmon and sea trout over its twenty years. Sea trout fishermen have kipped on camp beds, parties from Austria, Japan, Spain, France and England have enjoyed feasts and long lunches. The wine has flowed, the crack has been great and our family has many many happy memories. The ghosts of the Red Brae hut are all benign, and its walls await the next round of stories and accounts of great fish caught or lost.

Apart from anticipation of the new season, there are some important issues for the South Esk. The second year of Marine Scotland’s radio tagging project should tell us more about where our spring salmon spawn and where juveniles grow into parr. Next week the Esk Board’s AGM takes place with elections and the prospect of a new chairman. The new season will reveal if sea trout numbers continue to recover and spring salmon stocks hold up . The river needs some better news and it would be good for its reputation if the Kinnaird beats and Cortachy & Downie Park have better catches of both salmon and sea trout than in 2012.

Red Brae Pool (Castle Beat) in the snow

It will be interesting to see how the Dee performs after the encouraging number of early salmon caught on the Tay this week.

Atlantic Salmon Trust in Brussels

Monday, January 14th, 2013

I thought my readers would be interested to know about this visit in the context of the continuing problems of mixed stocks exploitation and salmon farming, although (thank goodness) only the first of these is relevant to the South Esk. While AST is a very small charity with 2.5 staff we feel that we have quite a lot of influence because of our reputation for science-based influencing and rational discussion. The issue of accidental damage to outgoing smolt migrations is of course highly relevant to the South Esk given the topography of the coast in the area of the river’s estuary.

AST at the European Commission

Last week the AST team were in Brussels to meet officials in DG Mare – the department responsible for European seas – and DG Environment – the department responsible for environment, habitats and biodiversity in the European Union.

Melfort Campbell, AST Chairman, Professor Ken Whelan, Research Director, Ivor Llewelyn, Director England and Wales and Tony Andrews, Chief Executive, met a number of key officials, all of whom welcomed the Trust’s team, and actively engaged with our concerns.

Addressing the by-catch problem.

The meeting with the Fisheries Conservation and Control Unit, Atlantic and Outermost Regions of the DG Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, was a follow-up to Ken Whelan’s attendance in December 2012 at the meeting of pelagic commercial fishermen in Amsterdam (Pelagic RAC).

At the Amsterdam meeting the Head of the Unit, Maria Candela-Castillo, had invited AST to meet members of the unit to discuss the issue of inadvertent by-catch of outgoing smolts by pelagic nets. It became clear during our discussion that DG Mare agree to be advocates for research into possible damage to outgoing smolt migrations as proposed by AST. Furthermore, Fuensanta Candela-Castillo expects AST attendance at the next pelagic RAC meeting to take the discussion forward.

For AST this was a satisfactory outcome, and enables us to address an area of concern to biologists and fisheries managers. It also gives substance and momentum to our effort to address the by-catch issue. It is now a priority for AST to meet the Chairman of the Pelagic RAC, who is based in Scotland.

Salmon Aquaculture:

Our second meeting with DG Mare was with Policy officers for Aquaculture Strategy, Common Fisheries Policy and Aquaculture. For AST this was really a briefing session for us to learn about the new EU Aquaculture Group which covers all aspects of aquaculture in both fresh and salt water. Anna Zito, the Aquaculture Policy Officer, explained that this massive new group will be unwieldy and too large to address specifics of salmon farming which, in the context of all forms of aquaculture, forms a small part. However, she explained that small subgroups will be established to deal with matters affecting each sub division of the sector, which should provide a focus for farmed salmon. We were also pleased to hear from Anna Zito that there will be full NGO participation in the main Aquaculture Advisory Group and in its sub groups.

The meeting ended with a short discussion about the importance of the consumer in the development of salmon farming, especially as new technologies such as close containment options, come into production.

 Environmental issues:

Our meeting with DG Environment was a morale raiser for the AST team because of the deep understanding of problems faced by wild salmon and sea trout shown by Micheal O’Brian and his colleagues. (This is the group that took forward Brian Marshall’s complaint about the effects of the Irish drift nets on English southern rivers, and which resulted in the Irish Government taking action to end drift netting. This is the very same group that will be dealing with the Brechin Angling Club complaint. The EU team consists of top-level scientists who require solid scientific data to back any complaint before they will recommend that the Commission takes action.)

The background to our meeting was SALSEA-Merge which had received funds of over £6 million from the EU and others. The discussion centred on biodiversity and conservation, with particular emphasis on the development of ‘safe migratory corridors’ for outgoing smolts. While it became clear that revisiting the designation of SACs in the hope of establishing new ones where there are perceived gaps at present, is unlikely to happen, it was encouraging to hear that there are other ways of protecting targeted species in the pelagic zone. We discussed the Marine Protected Area (MPA) approach and encouraging different methods of netting (e.g. lowering the front edge of trawls by 2 or 3 metres) to take the pressure off shoals of smolts. We felt that this was the start of a much longer discussion to focus on conserving and enhancing salmon and sea trout stocks with their full natural diversity. Like their DG Mare colleagues they agreed to be advocates for our approach to these issues.

 Outcomes:

After a busy day in Brussels when the AST team met key officials in the Commission we left with the knowledge that our efforts are being followed and supported by officials who have a deep understanding of the issues affecting the survival of wild Atlantic salmon and sea trout. While it is unfortunate that sea trout are not officially part of Habitats directive designated species, we were greatly reassured by the willingness of officials in DG Mare and DG Environment to listen to our concerns, and we were left in no doubt that, as a recognised ‘expert’ NGO on two important migratory indicator species, we can return to Brussels with our concerns when we need to do so.

Tony Andrews

14th January 2013

 

Atlantic Salmon Trust Review of 2012

Saturday, January 5th, 2013

Most readers of these blogs will know that I work for the Atlantic Salmon Trust, so I thought you might be interested to read our end of year message to supporters. While I couldn’t deny that there are some threats to the survival of wild salmon and sea trout, I hope you may feel encouraged by some shafts of light that are appearing after the success of the SALSEA project (research into the lives of salmon at sea).  Atlantic Salmon Trust. This new knowledge should ultimately make us better managers of salmon fisheries than we are at present, but there’s a long way to go. For me it is a never ending source of fascination to be working on the big picture simultaneously with managing a small east coast river fishery.

ATLANTIC SALMON TRUST

End of year review 2012

People have asked me recently, “What do you think is the actual state of wild Atlantic salmon stocks?”  While AST has no more information than ICES,  NASCO, or anyone else involved in salmon and sea trout conservation, we do perhaps have an overview of what is happening now, what the trends are, and in some circumstances, what can be done to improve survival. AST’s new strategy, which came into being after our Ocean Silver conference last December, takes the whole life of the salmon – from the egg to the kelt – and breaks it down into what we are calling “the three Pillars”, the ocean zone, coastal waters and the freshwater environment.

AST’s new approach has compelled us to think strategically about threats to both salmon and sea trout throughout their life cycles, and to identify places or periods in their lives where there are opportunities for remedial action. The last year, in the wake of NASCO’s Salmon Summit and AST’s own Ocean Silver conference, has been spent putting together, piece by piece, the new strategy. By looking at the whole lives of the two species from the viewpoints of a) what the threats are and b) Assessing risks to survival each threat poses in the light of likely effectiveness of management interventions, we have a plan of work that will keep us busy for at least the next five years.

The key outcome here is to prioritise the work plan on the basis of where we can make the greatest contribution to conservation, and ultimately survival of both species.

The last year has therefore been a period of gestation, as everyone involved in the science and management of migratory salmonids has clarified their objectives, and none more so than AST. We recognise, among many other initiatives, the outstanding work being done with AST support by GWCT on, for example, parr survival to smolt at East Stoke on the River Frome, and S&TA’s and AST’s hugely important lobbying effort to persuade Government to take action to protect the unique environment of the Southern chalk rivers. Work being done throughout the UK by the Rivers Trust and the Rivers and Fisheries Trusts of Scotland to improve water quality, flows and access for migratory fish is absolutely essential if our rivers are to produce optimum numbers of smolts. The increasing influence of the national fishing lobby has engaged the wider angling community, and given anglers highly effective political lobbying instruments. However, most of this work concentrates on the freshwater environment, with some notable exceptions.

In coastal waters the old chestnuts of mixed stocks netting and the impacts on salmon and sea trout of salmon aquaculture, have come under increasing scrutiny, with perceptible movement in terms of new data, technologies and opportunities to influence real changes in both areas.

While we cannot yet claim any outcome that has led immediately to a greater abundance of wild salmon and sea trout returning to rivers, the fact that there is now some movement in these debates means that there is at least a modicum of hope that real results can be achieved. The decision by the Westminster Government to phase out the NE drift nets before 2022 is most encouraging. Moreover, there is now recognition by government that T&J nets in England are operating mixed stocks fisheries. In cases where these nets are shown to exploit stocks close to or below conservation levels, they will also be closed. These are big steps forward, and will certainly benefit Scottish rivers, as well as English ones.

Salmon farming in Scotland continues to expand, with large farms being planned off the west coast. This valuable industry, in terms of jobs and revenue, as well as its contribution to removing the pressure off killing wild salmon, deserves our support. Most conservation bodies recognise that industrial scale exploitation of the seas is unsustainable, and that aquaculture can reduce that exploitation.

The problem is that salmon farming as currently practised has been shown to damage the environment and wild life in both fresh and salt water.

For AST this issue is a major challenge because, while we recognise  the achievements of the industry in terms of the economic and social boost is has provided to local communities along the west coast of Scotland, we know that it cannot continue as it is. The Trust’s recent efforts have focussed on alternative technologies where influents and effluents can be properly controlled, and a ‘biological firewall’ placed between farmed fish and the environment. The Trust is now looking carefully at closed containment (CC) technologies. After three visits to Canada and USA to look at the prototype CC industry there, AST has supported its development in the UK. The new re-circulating freshwater systems have been shown to work in terms of the technology, controlled grow-out and product quality, but have not yet persuaded the investment community to take the plunge. With interest being shown in China, Romania, as well as in countries experiencing the adverse effects of open cage systems, we are confident that commercial initiatives are not far off.

The next three years will see AST moving forward, guided by its Three Pillars strategy.

Under Pillar 1 – the ocean – we will identify as precisely as possible the salmon’s ocean migration routes, work with governments to include salmon in their ongoing pelagic monitoring, negotiate safe passage for salmon along their migration corridors. We will also be building an extensive database of the genetic ‘signature’ of historic salmon samples taken from the Greenland and Faroes commercial fisheries and relate those to regions and increasingly to rivers of origin in the UK. For example, knowledge of where salmon from rivers with fragile populations feed will enable us to negotiate with the Greenland Government reductions in fishing intensity in those specific areas. This approach should also enable prediction models to be developed for advising managers of future migrations in terms of both quality and abundance.

Pillar 1. This is the mid Atlantic Ocean, across which our salmon migrate to reach the Greenland feeding grounds. AST aims to negotiate safe corridors for smolt migrations to prevent them ending their lives as by-catch in commercial trawler nets.

Where Spring Salmon feed: the Greenland Coast

Pillar 1. Where the South Esk’s spring salmon feed. This is the west coast of Greenland in the summer of 2011.

Under Pillar 2 – coastal waters – we will identify all existing and potential threats to the safe passage of outgoing migrations of smolts and inward migrations of returning adults. We will then quantify these threats in a risk analysis and prioritise them in terms of our ability to take remedial actions. Inevitably most of the threats where we can take effective action are manmade. We will therefore work closely with our partner organisations and with governments to reduce threats, such as those posed by renewable energy generation and transmission, coastal pollution, impacts of climate change (eg invasive species) salmon farming and mixed stocks exploitation of salmon and sea trout, to an absolute minimum. We will also maintain a close watch on damage to stocks from predation, especially in estuaries.

PILLAR 2 - coastal waters -Rough seas in the Pentland Firth

Montrose Basin, the estuary of the South Esk

Pillar 2. This is Montrose Basin, the tidal lagoon that forms a unique feature of the South Esk estuary. Superb habitat for water fowl, especially geese, waders and birds of prey, it is also important coastal habitat for wild salmonids. There is considerable concern about a current planning application  to install two-way tidal turbines on each side of the new bridge in Montrose, where the South Esk enters the open sea. 

Under Pillar 3 – the freshwater environment – we recognise that the catchment-based monitoring, measuring and maintenance work done by fisheries trusts is the key to natural smolt production. However there is also a vital role for AST in raising awareness of issues such as flows, the role of small streams, the efficacy of stocking, the welfare of sea trout populations and stock assessment.  The Trust’s overview  of the whole lives of salmon and sea trout means we are better placed than ever to support our partners in their work, to initiate new research and communicate results to fisheries managers on the riverbank.

Tyndals Pool

Pillar 3. Tyndals Pool on Finavon Castle Water at a good spring height

AST finds itself increasingly working across national borders, sometimes taking a lead role in bringing together new data under the Three Pillars approach. Our conservation effort focuses on influencing, promoting and enabling relevant research and communicating results to fisheries organisations, trusts and the public.

Lemno pools full of parr

AST is the only conservation charity devoted solely to promoting the wellbeing of wild salmon and sea trout across their full range of habitats at sea and in fresh water. We do not have a subscribing membership, but we do have a growing constituency of AST Friends who regularly give money to the Trust. Because we are a very small organisation (2.5 staff), and are supported by a team of some of the most eminent scientists in the field, we are able to exert our independent leadership separate from any vested interest. While we work in harmony with others in the sector, it is our freedom to develop thought-leadership that gives AST its ability to work with partners throughout the North Atlantic region, especially in the UK and Ireland. Please visit our website and become an AST Friend if you like what you read.

At the end of the day the only success measure will be a recorded improvement in numbers of wild salmon and sea trout returning to our rivers.

WWW.atlanticsalmontrust.org

TA

3 Jan 2013