Archive for the ‘Fishing Report’ Category

2012 SEASON REVIEW OF CATCHES

Sunday, November 25th, 2012

 These bulletin blogs represent news about Finavon and the South Esk, and my views as a riparian owner. They are not the views of any other organisation, nor are they designed to promote the interests of any individual or organisation other than Finavon Castle Water and factors affecting the fishery. Tony Andrews

These bulletins are not exclusively about FCW or the South Esk. I am lucky to be able to travel where the salmon swims to keep in touch with knowledgeable scientists and fishery managers. On the basis of what they tell me I try to relate what is happening in the Ocean with what they tell me about salmon returning to Finavon’s pools. Those fish are likely to be the multi sea winter salmon that return to the South Esk in the early months of the year, and again perhaps in the autumn. One day genetic mapping will give us the full picture.

Secrets of the salmon’s life revealed: As we open each new ‘casket’ of data provided by scientists, with their new instruments and methods of research, such as genetics, chemical analysis of scales and stable isotopes, we become aware of yet another facet of the extraordinary and awesome lives of these wild creatures. Believe it or not we can now re-enact the whole life history of a salmon that has returned to the South Esk by reading its scales and analysing certain tissue samples. We can work out where they have been, what they have eaten, how deep they have dived at sea, water temperatures and salinity, and, provided we know the precise length from the point of the head to the fork in the tail, the weekly growth rate and physical condition throughout the life of a salmon.

These new data come on top of the things we already know about salmon. The main contribution to our knowledge is coming from genetic analysis and mapping, which is starting to describe the ‘big picture’ about salmon (and sea trout) migrations and behaviour at sea. How extraordinary that we can put men on the Moon and send space probes beyond our galaxy, but we still don’t know how many salmon return to the South Esk each year, nor do we know how many smolts the river produces, nor what proportion of these smolts are salmon or sea trout. Isn’t it time we did?

Here are the catch returns for the 2012 season. While it is nothing over which we can particularly upbeat, in what I can only describe as a lacklustre season, FCW came out top for the South Esk in terms of catches of both salmon and sea trout with 137 salmon and 161 sea trout. 3 aspects of our 2012 catches stand out 1.The continuing quality and reasonable numbers of our spring salmon 2. The continuing improvement of sea trout runs. 3. The size and good physical condition of most of our MSW salmon.

Milton Beat

Pools Salmon Sea trout
Bridge Pool 1 0
Tyndals 26 13
Willows 22 32
Upper Boat 4 5
Volcano 8 8
Lower Boat 8 7
Flats 2 7
TOTALS 71 72

Castle Beat

Pool Salmon Sea trout
Craigo Stream 0 1
Red Brae 12 9
Kirkinn 1 2
Pheasantry 0 4
Nine Maidens 0 1
Beeches 5 5
TOTALS 18 22

Bogardo Beat

Pools Salmon Sea trout
Haughs Pool 6 10
Harry’s Bar 8 4
Martin’s Cut 1 1
Tollmuir Pool 1 3
Steps & Toms 1 1
House Pool 4 9
TOTALS 21 28

  Indies Beat

Pools Salmon Sea trout
Melgund Pool 2 8
Frank’s Stream 7 17
Indies Pool 18 14
TOTALS 27 39

Smolt production: comparing two rivers.

If you compare the total numbers of smolts produced by the North and South Esks one might speculate that the two rivers produce similar numbers. The difference is that a high proportion of smolts leaving the South Esk are trout. Numbers of returning adults caught by rods give us some indication of the possible breakdown of salmon to sea trout. Take two beats as a comparison –

Comparing catches from FCW on the South Esk and Stracathro on the North Esk, If you add the Fishesk recorded 2012 catches of salmon and sea trout together for each beat, you get FCW 310 and Stracathro 217. If we think about those figures, we should recognise that to produce 527 adult salmon and sea trout caught by rods on the two beats, there would have to have been a very large number of smolts of both species migrating out of the two rivers, perhaps as many as 5,000 (on the basis of an optimistic 10% survival rate) to produce a rod catch of 527 adult fish. That’s a lot of smolts!

Salmon and sea trout smolts are roughly the same size when they migrate out of their rivers, and probably require a similar amount of food to nourish them as the grow from fry to parr to smolt. We humans put a greater value on returning salmon than we do on sea trout. Rents and capital values of fisheries reflect this point, but the biological fact is that, in their different ways, the two rivers are both fertile and productive. It is just that the South Esk favours sea trout over salmon, while the Northie is the other way round. Improving sea trout runs therefore give us an indication of how well the South Esk is recruiting smolts, and we should take this into consideration, as well as salmon smolt recruitment when considering the condition of freshwater habitats in the catchment.

TA 24/11/2012

 

FCW 2012 Catches in context.

Friday, November 2nd, 2012

These bulletin blogs represent news about Finavon and the South Esk, and my views as a riparian owner. They are not the views of any other organisation, nor are they designed to promote the interests of any individual or organisation other than Finavon Castle Water and factors affecting the fishery. Tony Andrews

2012 has been a strange season on the South Esk. We have never quite known, right up to the last days of the season, whether it was to be a season of plenty or famine. In the end it was neither and ended as a curate’s egg of a season – good in parts and bad in parts.

12lbs salmon

12lbs salmon

MSW fish like this one were a feature of the season, but there were also some undersized, ill-fed grilse among catches at Finavon. It seems that the marine migration experience of our 1SW fish (grilse) is very different from that of our MSW fish, which may confirm the views of ecologists that the ‘near’ feeding areas in the Norwegian Sea, within the range of grilse, are much less productive than the western part of the North Atlantic in terms of salmon prey species. Two factors – numbers of returning fish and condition of those survivors – support that theory.

I received an interesting e-mail this week which remarked,

Had just finished fishing on Tuesday morning and was buzzed by a helicopter flying up the river with a fancy aeriel sticking out of a skid. I would suspect that they were trying to find some tagged fish, were they successful ? I wonder if the 12lb cock fish which I had just landed and returned was one of them !
I have had a great few days, four fish (and) I must say that I have seen more fish this year in the last week than ever before.”

If only Marine Scotland had enough money to hire helicopters, and if they did I do hope they wouldn’t waste their money on chasing just 12 radio tagged fish in that expensive way! But, more to the point, isn’t it interesting that someone who lives and fishes in the Tannadice area should have such a positive view of the abundance of salmon in the river? Such observations are always of interest, but of course they are only little pieces in a large and complex jig-saw of observational data. It is quite possible in a river, as subject to variable flows as the South Esk is, that certain sections of the river become stopping areas for adult fish on their upstream migration, especially in the late season close to spawning time. The same applies to sea trout which, as happened about ten years ago at Brechin Castle, can ‘favour’ a section of the river and form huge shoals in pools in that part of the river. I think the message is “take all reports with a pinch of salt and use them to build the big picture”!

After an e-mail discussion my friend sent this e-mail, which I think also makes interesting reading:

“The chopper was definitely following the river and at about 150 feet, was not the police looking for a body, definitely had a fancy aeriel though. could see it through the “Rommels”.
I was fishing Forfar water, this is the opposite bank at Tannadice from down river at Justinhaugh to past the old railway bridge at Barnyards. It is not bad if you catch it right as any fish in the system tend to plough straight on. However friends of John Grieve were fishing Inshewan at the same time and between two of them only had two fish for the week. I must say that I saw quite a few fish and a few brutes. I did not have a camera with me as I tend to have enough to do to fish when I am by myself !! The first three fish were all still silvery two cocks and one hen. Both cock fish were about 5lb and the hen over eight. The last fish on Tuesday was the biggest a cock fish over 12lbs a bit coloured but a beauty really deep bodied and strong, took a bit to recover but swam away strongly. All caught on the same fly, bright orange Flame Thrower tied by my own fair hand fished on a floating line. The leaves were becoming a pest.”

FCW Catch returns for 2012

 Beat No of Salmon No of Grilse No of Sea trout
Milton 76    (55.47%) (14) 75    (46.58%)
Bogardo 19    (13.80%) (3) 24    (14.90%)
Castle 16    (11.67%) (2) 17    (10.55%)
Indies 26    (18.90%) (6) 45    (27.95%)
FCW 137  (100.00%) (25) 161  (100.00%)

The fine performance of Milton Beat may be attributed to 2012 being a very wet year. In a previous blog I commented on the ‘plateau effect’ which seems to favour the stretch of river between Tyndals Pool and the tail of the Flats, especially in high water.

Fishing Volcano Glide in late October 2012

William Simper fishing a long line through the best part of Volcano Glide on Milton Beat in the last week of October 2012. Volcano is a star performer among the pools of FCW and, as the catch return above shows, Milton Beat was by far the best beat in 2012, but that is not always the case because high water levels favour the ‘plateau’ of Milton Beat.

FCW in context of recent seasonal rod catches of the South Esk

Catches from selected beats (Cortachy & Downie Park, Inshewan, Finavon and Kinnaird Upper, Middle & Lower) over the last five seasons, including 2012.

Salmon

Beat 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Av.
CC & DP 143 158 153 146 117 143
Inshewan 147 99 118 153 112 126
Finavon 221 103 136 139 137 147
Kinnaird 204 161 460 123 74 228
Totals 715 521 867 561 440 621

 Sea trout

Beat 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Av.
CC & DP 120 236 275 128 102 172
Inshewan 52 111 126 101 110 100
Finavon 100 118 121 101 161 120
Kinnaird 112 197 203 207 193 182
Totals 376 662 725 523 566 570

Note: I think it is reasonable to claim that these four fisheries (see tables above) produce about three fifths (60%) of the rod catch for the whole river. With fisheries such as Careston, Kintrockat, Justinhaugh, House of Dun, Brechin Castle, BAC, KAC, FAC, Braedownie, the whole of the Prosen, and others not included in the catches above, it is perhaps reasonable to claim that those fisheries together produce the other two fifths (40%). Recent rod catch returns for the river have diminished taking the river from 17th to 24th in the list of UK rivers in order of average salmon catches. It would be good to see this trend reversed, which may come about with increased fishing effort, especially in the spring, but that can only happen if there is more confidence in the river from the angling community.

Ian Hardy's 31 lbs cock salmon from Marcus

Ian Hardy’s big salmon from Marcus. Fish of this size (see photo above) have been present in the South Esk during most seasons. A well conditioned cock fish of 31lbs (probably 35lbs+ when it entered the river) preparing to spawn tells us that something is going right. We might speculate on the life story of this fish (sorry, I don’t have scales) from ovum to returned survivor, but what we can see is that this MSW salmon, most likely 3SW, made it to sea as a smolt, survived inshore threats (predation and suchlike) successfully migrated to its oceanic (Greenland maybe) feeding grounds, and returned in good condition to the South Esk; a round-trip of 6,000 miles as the fish swims. He is still alive, and I hope powering up to find some sexy hen fish with whom to mate over a well dug redd somewhere in good clean cobbles upstream.

With the bad press the river gets it is not surprising that some beats have had difficulty in filling letting slots. It is too easy to attribute reduced rod catches to lower numbers of fish in the river. There are other factors at play here, and no-one should assume that any one of them is the single cause of any perceived or actual decline in numbers. The truth is that we don’t know and, to find out what the real situation is, we now need to invest in counting salmon into the river and measuring recruitment from ova to smolt. That investment is long overdue. A new board will be elected next spring, and let us all hope that a new direction of management for the South Esk starts with sound data, building on what we already know. When we have the facts we can concentrate all our efforts on resolving any identified problems. As a meercat might say, “simple..ckhckhckh!”

TA 2nd November 2012

South Esk season ends with a 31bs fish from Marcus

Tuesday, October 30th, 2012

These bulletin blogs represent news about Finavon and the South Esk, and my views as a riparian owner. They are not the views of any other organisation, nor are they designed to promote the interests of any individual or organisation other than Finavon Castle Water and factors affecting the fishery. Tony Andrews

These last few days of the season have been a disappointment, mainly because there has been a shortage of fresh fish, and precious few stale ones to keep the spirits up. The main pools – Willows, Red Brae and Indies – have shown a few fish, with Red Brae holding a reasonable number, including at least two respectably silver large salmon.

Charlie fishing through Willows on 30 Oct 12

Charlie Palmer concentrating on fishing the main lie at Willows in crystal clear and rather low water, with no result on this occasion. The last days of October 2012 were a disappointment for Will and Charlie, who are both teachers and come to Finavon every year to fish during the autumn term holiday.

With two mustard-keen fishermen in the forms of Charlie Palmer and Will Simper fishing every daylight minute, and with no mean level of skill, the only catch has been a sea trout (probably a kelt) and a small grilse, both caught and returned in Harry’s Bar (Bogardo Beat) and Volcano (Milton Beat) respectively.

Will Simper fishing Volcano

Will Simper fishing the glide into Volcano in a nice water on the 29th of October, but there were only a few fish in the pool. However, later in the day he caught and returned a small grilse from this pool.

Despite the poor show of autumn fish I will not be bewailing the demise of the South Esk as a salmon fishery, which all too often I hear from those of little faith and absolutely no data (!), because in general there has been a reasonable show of salmon from the beginning of March and throughout the very wet summer. As I have said before, rod catches should not be giving us any more than the broadest indication of the wellbeing of salmon stocks, and we certainly should not be setting our management objectives in stone on the strength of them. However, I would not contest an opinion that, in terms of abundance of both salmon and sea trout, 2012 was no better than an average year at best.

 On the subject of rod catches, I note that the three major middle/upper river beats, Cortachy & Downie Park, Inshewan and Finavon Castle Water are reporting (on 30/10/2012) 117, 112 and 137 salmon totalling 366 salmon and grilse for the 2012 season. Not great. Sea trout catches for the upper river are also poor at 373 for the three beats.

Tom fishing Red Brae

Tom Emerson fishing the Red Brae at the Lemno Burn junction on 29 October

Based on observation of the FCW beats, coastal nets catch reports (unreliable) and rod catches, I think it is fair to claim that 2012 was not a prolific year for the South Esk’s wild salmon and sea trout. For the angler it was lacklustre, but not disastrous, and it did have its good moments. Perhaps the most exciting but ultimately disappointing moment was the fish hooked and lost by Alec Towns in Beeches back in August. That really was a big fish which he saw again and again from close quarters during the 30 minute struggle. Losing a fish as the result of the brand new £500 rod shattering when applying side strain to a played-out salmon of 28 lbs or so is an angler’s catastrophe, but will guarantee Alec’s return!

Ian Hardy's 31 lbs cock salmon from Marcus

This 31lbs cock salmon (49″) was caught in Root Pool on the Marcus (N) side by Ian Hardy on 30 October 2012. This is the largest salmon caught at either Finavon or Marcus for many years, although both fisheries have seen fish larger than this one in every season, and there are records of big fish landed in former times, including one of 40lbs plus from Breadalbane Pool in the 1960s.

A final blast from the season came last night when Ian Hardy, the tenant at Marcus Estate sent me the photo above of a 31lbs salmon, in the glorious colours of a cock fish nearing spawning time, caught in Root Pool on Marcus Estate’s fishing. This salmon is the biggest for some years from either Finavon or Marcus, but I do recall a fish of similar size at Careston from the Common Pool, which was netted by the late Alasdair Petrie, ghillie at Finavon, for John Wood, the Glamis Estate factor. Sadly we have no record of that fish apart from the verbal accounts. In 2012 we saw and connected with a number of big fish, but probably nothing as large as Ian’s fish above.

TA 1st November 2012